The Star-Ledger uses its editorial page today to call for an extension of the income tax hike passed earlier this year on high-wage earners.
The crux of their argument is,
Chris Christie, the Republican governor-elect, still wants to cut taxes for the state’s wealthiest households next year. That was his promise during the campaign, and his spokeswoman affirmed that intention yesterday....
Christie says the tax cut is crucial to improving the business climate in New Jersey. While our top rate remains competitive with New York City, it is much higher than those in Pennsylvania and Delaware. But business executives choose locations for several reasons, not just income taxes. They look for a skilled workforce, good transportation, and quality of life. Many businesses, from dentists and pizzerias to law firms, are tied to local customers.
A few counterpoints,
- This is not a tax cut; it is keeping the "just one year" promise made by legislators in June. The income tax increase passed as part of the budget process applied retroactively to income earned between January 1, 2009 and January 1, 2010 as per the original legislation. Therefore, the top marginal income tax rate is scheduled to be 8.97% next year. Making it 10.75% again requires a new law and is therefore a tax increase.
- The Star-Ledger asserts the tax increase last year will raise a total of $1 billion. That remains unknown given that income tax collections thus far are $122 million below the state's expectations.
- New Jersey's top income tax rate is topped only by Hawaii. That provides a disincentive for companies and entrepreneurs to locate or expand here. Why would they believe that an extension is only temporary when the one year increase would have already been extended and we have a host of other "temporary" taxes (such as TEFA) on which the sun never sets?




